Design of graphs of dungeons

Started by Diarandor, April 17, 2017, 05:58:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
This video explains a bit how to make a dungeon graph, which is useful to design a dungeon. It is not exactly a tutorial, but it is interesting.
https://youtu.be/fqKGl6exyyY
"If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you. But if you really make them think, they'll hate you."

This video (about Link's awakening) is really nice too:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AezAN2RcO8Y

This guy has made analysis of the dungeons for most of the Zelda games; I think these are worth it to see if you are developping a Zelda game.
"If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you. But if you really make them think, they'll hate you."

I love how he breaks down the dungeons. I have seen everyone of those videos he has made. I definitely recommend checking them out.

April 18, 2017, 12:14:10 AM #3 Last Edit: April 18, 2017, 12:19:21 AM by MetalZelda
What I kept from this is backtracking, main item and boss for 2d, main room, main item and boss for 3d, also exploration, fighting enemies and play around with the main item.
The funniest level design is Twilight Princess, which speaks for itself.

But again, it really depend on how you see and how you'll design a certain dungeon, i mean, in a Link Between worlds, the main item is deleted to focus on exploration, same in Breath of the Wild.

In Breath of the Wild, there is a lot of "Find your path" in the dungeons. There is no main item because you get them all at the start of the game, but there is still a condition to unlock new passages.

Very interesting channel. I watch a lot of video yesterday, not only the Boss Keys one. I love how he draws the graphs in the end, very clear and smooth. I'm wondering what he'd think of the Mystery of Solarus DX (and XD) games :) clearly, the 6th and 7th dungeons are a lot of find your path, while others are just follow the path. Maybe these games are too close to ALTTP to really break the formula he establised for this one.

I am gonna take notes on these videos. I think information like this would be very useful in the game development section of the book I am working on. Also, I could add more ideas to the brainstorm post.

An interesting remark is that when you have a key and a multiple choice of doors to unlock, the graph may become different depending on that choice (that is not completely the case in key cavern of LA, though). This is easier to see if we allow to have color keys and one color key gives such a choice; with color keys the graph thing could even become much more complex, depending on the choices.
"If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you. But if you really make them think, they'll hate you."

An example to explain what I mentioned would be a dungeon with only 1 red key and only 1 blue key, but several red locks and several blue locks. This is a weird example of dungeon with more locks than keys (completionists may not like the idea of having locks that cannot be opened, though). There would be multiple solutions, which also adds more replayability to the game. Buth this is also a double-edged sword for the devs since they are forced to check that all choices allow to solve the dungeon, without "breaking" the game, heheh.
"If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you. But if you really make them think, they'll hate you."

I made a dungeon layout related to this post. The graphics are from Xevin's CC0 (public domain) Simple tileset. No need to credit me. I attached the source and work files to this post. (login to view it)

I think it might be useful to someone. I added this in the book with a simple description on how to make a basic dungeon.


Mark Brown has uploaded a new interesting video: https://youtu.be/1ewa26q76fE
"If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you. But if you really make them think, they'll hate you."


This new video of Mark Brown is really interesting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnpAAX9CkIc
It points out subtle things of interactions between entities in games, which IMO is very important to create new mechanics and puzzles.
"If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you. But if you really make them think, they'll hate you."